Is Steve Harmon guilty? He was a part of a robbery and he "shot" someone and killed them. He
is on trial for murder now. But the question is... Did he do it, Steve was supposed to be a
look-out for the robbery. He was just supposed to go inside and tell the others if there was
anyone in the store. He supposedly did and did not give them a sign. And Mr. Sawiki said Steve was
out looking for a place to film his movie. I do not think Steve Harmon is guilty.
Steve was supposed to be a lookout for the robbery. He was just supposed to go inside and
tell the others if there was anyone in the store. He supposedly did and didn't give them a "sign". Steve says he was not in the store that day, he said he was out in his neighborhood looking for a place to film his movie for film class. Mr. Sawiki also said Steve was out looking for a place to film his movie.
Steve does not need to prove his innocence to anybody but the jury. And we are the jury!
The biggest thing to prove Steve Harmon's innocence is that Steve did not get a cut of the money from the robbery. If no one gave Steve any money from the robbery then why should we think he was there. When someone robs a bank they are not doing it to kill anyone, they are doing it to try to get some money. Bobo and King got the money, but Steve Harmon did not get any money from the robbery, so how could he be there? Steve would not just want to participate in a robbery just to kill someone, unless he had a grudge against them. Steve did not even know Mr. Nesbitt so why would he want to kill him.
If Steve really was there then he would have got some of the money. I think Steve is guilty
because when he writes in his journal he is not talking to the jury members, he is talking to the
readers and what does he care if the readers think he is guilty or not guilty. I really do not think
he cares. If he does not care then why would he lie in his journal entries. If he lied in the journal
then he would just be...