With the increasing thirst of privacy peep over celebrities and public figures among the public, journalists and
reporters are driven to pry much deeper for a story that no one else has been able to disclose and dig further into
all aspects of celebrities' lives by means of highly advanced technology which enables them to get information more
easily and instantaneously.
Disclose of celebrities turns out mostly to be a negative side of them since people have an inclination to focus and
gossip on the deficiency of others, especially on the famous ones. Whether the exposure involves one's ill habit or
marital infidelities, it will all be harmful to the victims to some extent,especially when those misconducts are
against what they advocate or what they are trying to instill to the public. For example, when a politician who
advocate strict ban on tobacco is found to be a smoker himself, absurd may it sounds or when an actor who act as a
positive role,perhaps an hero appointed to save the earth, turns out to be involved in some ethical issues, not only
do they totally ruin their reputation by strong contrast between on the screen and outside the screen, but also
deeply hurt their audience and supporters and most probably bring about negative effect and dissatisfaction on
society. For example,the record-breaking Olympic swimmer Michael Phelps who was exposed to be engaged in smoking
dope, has set a bad example for the youth all over the world and let down millions of people in spite of his
outstanding demonstration of strength and confidence in the athletic field.
Admittedly, misbehavior of individuals should be pointed out and then rectified, yet not in a way of exposure to the
public and criticized by those unacquainted people which run counter to the notion of preservation of human right.
Celebrities are just ordinary people when they are not appearing on the show. We should not expect one to be as...